NEWS:

A MarketPlace of Ideas

Mathematical Living for a Better Tomorrow

January 7th, 2007

Who Killed the Electric Car? Mr Reality and Mr Physics Conspired to do it!


Let this article be a study in the critical thinking paths necessary to see through bunk.

Electric cars to date are provably NOT usable.  Why it is so clear to me ?   Because Golf carts sell well yet no viable electric cars on on the market.   Why isn’t the conspiracy interested in golf carts? They are only a hop skip and jump away from a car.

When I hear a citizen talk on anything that involves engineering or physical principles I laugh, cringe and think they are effeminate all at the same time.  Engineers, the good ones are typically pretty manly.  You do not go into their houses and see a womans touch in the decor UNLESS they have a mate.

That brings me to the electric car.  I saw the girly man attention craver that made the movie about who supposedly killed the electric car concept.  For anyone with an engineering background it makes you wince to realize how most of the populace is without mental tools to deal with the external world.  Only a girly man with no engineering skills could have believed in the concept that someone killed the electric car as a concept.  Er well either no E-skills or a wanton needy Hollywood type that craves attention. That seems rather feminine to me also so I repeat myself.

So when you hear people talk about alternative energy sources or electric cars or any other of the myriad things that are being suppressed by the great cabal remember this:   The great conspiracy suppressing the usage of electric cars, alternative energy and the like are the principles and physics of nature.  And that is the most ambivalant and effective of any conspiracy ever.

Some day their time will come.  You can bet that day is some day after today.

January 7th, 2007

Governmental Republicans do not Understand the Extreme Effectiveness of Capitalism


 

From the Debka report comes a preview of the new Bush plan for Iraq:

http://debka.com/headline.php?hid=3689

The next stage, possibly the toughest, is to bring a form of stability and security to Baghdad, for which an infusion of troops will be required, followed by the partition of Iraq into three semi-autonomous Kurdish, Shiite and Sunni regions. Baghdad will serve as the federal capital. Its key role will be the administration of Iraq’s oil resources. Oil revenue will be distributed equitably to all three regions by a higher oil authority, whose members will not be Iraqis but Iraqi federal government appointees backed by the national army.

These arrangements which depend largely on the continuing cooperation of the two clerics are intended to pave the way for the orderly exit of US forces from Iraq.

(Picture: US soldiers in the northern oil city of Kirkuk. Under the new Bush plan, US units will control the oil city and its oil fields to fend off a Kurdish grab)

 Comments: 

1)  It appears that GW is finally getting the partitioning idea through his head.  If he were a true conservative he would have done that FIRST THING.  Why ?  What do conservatives want here in the USA ? How man times have we heard about states rights and devolving authority back to the states from conservatives ???? Damn do I have to explain absolutely EVERYTHING?  

2) It appears GW does not get capitalism.  He is a closet Dem.  Why else would they consider it necessary to prevent the Kurds from “grabbing” the oil fields?  I am of the Tony Soprano school of thought here.  Reward the captains that are playing ball.  We should be quietly ENCOURAGING the Kurds to grab the oil fields.  The more we fund our good ally and the more we DE-fund from our enemies the better things will go………

 

 

 Related comments here: http://www.amarketplaceofideas.com/listen-up-dummy-that-means-you-bush-baker-and-gates.htm  .   A  followup on those comments would include that the overtures towards Syria and Iran where merely ass covering in case this new strategy gets us into a war with either or both.

Conclusion:  I have  concerns regarding sustainability.  Whatever choice is made it should be sustainable.  Unless the plan is to go to full on war with Iran, then sustainability is the key.  This is going to take a while.

January 7th, 2007

Conquest Version 1.0 thru 3.0-How Armies Conquer-Old World, The Social Lubricant of Commerce in the New World


Conquest Version 1.0

In days of old when there were not 7-11 convenience stores on every corner there had to be a different method of supplying an army as it conquered new lands. One way or another you have to eat to survive. Simple right ? The method was to pillage. This served three purposes:

*The army eats

*The army finds valuable things and gets paid

*The populace is weakened and can not resist

I am sure in reality it was a brutal process with alot of associated sociopathic behavior. In fact its probably how alot of sociopaths spread their seed by serially raping in village after village. This firmly set the genes in our gene-pool. Care to go swimming ? Not me.

This did lead to the spread of ideas. I would guess there were alot of organic processes that lead to integration of soldiers into local societies and therefore said spread.

As far as I can see this was the most appropriate description for the process up through 1800.

Conquest Version 2.0

In World War 2 there was a major conflict of military powers. The United States after this conflict probably managed to gain some economic advantage. This is appropriate as a sort of Process-Optimization-Penalty-Tax** In this version of conquest it was a much improved version over 1.0. Nations were rebuilt. People treated humanely. Societies allows to thrive to the point that they are feared for their manufacturing prowess. Think Japan. For this every liberal who actually is not faking a good heart for the sake of votes should thank us right wing capitalist mother-fuckers. They should thank us because its our baby, capitalism and commerce that did this miracle. By using the natural architecture of human and physical existance we absorbed the conquered nations into our Empire-Of-Ideas and therefore function.***

Conquest Version 3.0 - Currently being developed

The core principle of version 2.0 is that commerce and free enterprise are the most effective method for transforming nations. Bombs destroy. Any damned fool can break something. If you want to be the edifice with marble pillars in the minds of the masses you need to be the most effective at building. For this reason I was very happy to see this headline linked in the DrudgeReport:

PAPER: Western firms will cash in on Iraq’s oil wealth…Case in point Iraq. Lets review:

a) take out nasty regime and box in Iran from both sides. ( this process is finished until the Dems cock it up )

b) Install a free government - Of course what you and I regular people call a free government differs from what a unionized Washington political insider would call a free government.

c) Let the western companies into Iraq to exploit their strong suits in partnership with the local cronies. In the process the local cronies learn by osmosis the more efficient commerce practices of the west. It can not be missed that it is a modern version of and Army Traveling on its Stomach. The principle being to replace a VERY antiquated government type. This will work. Information is moving more quickly in our day. By the law of large numbers I predict that in spite of any short term set backs Iraq has been brought forward on its time table by the remainder time that Saddam would have naturally lived had he not been deposed.

The alternative to all of this is nothing. We did not have the luxury of doing nothing. The demographics of Moslem reproduction is such that we can not ignore them. Simply put they are out-reproducing us. Our only alternative is to reprogram them as fast and humanely as we can……… Errr well there is one other alternative. Let them reprogram us. There would be only one good feature to this. Watching liberals whine as they got all their odd wierd collection of confabulated causes squashed like bugs.

FootNotes
**Process-Optimization-Penalty-Tax. What that is for you non-engineers is a sort of penalty paid for sub-optimum parameters when running simulations. Oh and I maybe forgot to tell you that what you live in can be viewed as a distributed computer were sometimes the penalty paid is hanging.

***Of course you Libs will have a hard time with this. You haven’t moved past the ideas of Kings and Queens. I think its tough for you because your ideas are so off base that getting to the reality is pretty tough. All your ideas when fully put into practice are tantamount to Stalinism or National Socialism.

|