In response to my arty about how John Edwards ideas must be weak because he’s afraid to appear at a Fox News debate I received the following comment:
———————-
gatordem Says:
When one is speaking about denial, one might first want to look in the mirror. To say Faux News “only appears a tiny bit conservative because its not wildly liberal like EVERY other outlet” shows the apparent state of denial that you MUST live in. It is ludicrous on its face.
The well published comments by Faux News executives show very clearly that they are far from fair and balanced in their viewpoints. Any candidate for public office should be happy to have their ideas cross examined by an impartial examiner. To submit to such a cross examination by a judge who has already found you guilty would show a serious lack of good judgement to me.
That would be the same serious lack of good judgement you have demonstrated in this post.
———————
I replicated the comment here to allow easy dissection of his thought processes or lack thereof.
Its amazing, this lib doesn’t issue any credit for us conservatives having put up with the liberal media cartel for near 50 years. But then they are all little dictators. When people such as me offer to be left out of their plans they conscript us by forcing us to help pay for their schemes through the tax code. Sounds like little mini Stalin to me. Do they even know how un-cool it is attempting to bully Fox in this fashion? In the bad old days before Fox there were only the liberal outlets. Conservatives like Reagan had no option but to appear and do his best, present his ideas and let libs act like he’s a certified just escaped from the loony bin nut. And thus I stand by my comments that Edwards and his ideas are weak. Ronald Reagan issued forth his ideas in an age where the entire media industry complex consisted of old fashioned “progressive” ( term really means regressive in Stalin doublespeak ) liberals. The entire antique media used to put on this act like this was a doddering old man who didn’t know what he was saying. ( he did know ) It was quite a transparent act. Fox does not disrespect dem candidates like this EVEN when they would merit it.
The Big Picture
The Stalinist tactics being used to re-attain their liberal news media cartel is common to all their efforts. These people are using it everywhere. This gatordem fellow is acting mad because acting high and mighty is the same method they are trying to shove MMGW (man made global warming) down our throats.
Examples
Fox News- Bully by saying its unfair blah blah blah. Their tactic is to start complaining and keep complaining till they wear Joe Average out. They want to marginalize Fox News. They want to maintain the liberal / socialist / communist / dem party news cartel that fox threatens to bust up. You can see great energy is being expended by the libs on the Fox News issue. Any candidate stupid enough to go with the wacko lib blogger ban on Fox will not be president. We demand tougher stock as our president. ( Even without the aforesaid analysis John Edwards is obviously not going to be president. )
MMGW- tactic = bully by saying “everyone believes” or “the scientific consensus is in there is no doubt” or that you are a “climate - denier” ( gatordem almost without a doubt believes in MMGW, one can spot the lack of critical thinking skills in his short post)
Bush Attorney Firings - Clinton fires 93, Bush fires 8. Harp until charges are taken seriously.
In the end they like the authoritarian model where we would not really be given any choices. They are willing to use any sort of non-reality to self rationalize what they do. Thus their pain with Fox News. They experience great psychological pain when anyone questions their thoughts and words. They want their narcissistic news feeds of CNN, CBS,ABC,NBC,MSNBC that only reflect their ideas rather than do any critical analysis of them.
Analysis
Will the HARPY method work ? The method of the harpy is to wear people down. Batter them constantly until the bullied will do what you ask thinking its reasonable because they are comprimising. They forget to calibrate in that the harpy position was way out there and that a comprimise average of the two positions still leaves the result way out there. I’ve seen this personally with a friend named Phil. When working on communal techy projects Phil would yell and be unpredictible. It got to the point where the gentler natured of the crew would simply give in to his tantrums. The plasticity in their nature allowed them to do so. They were natural confrontation avoiders. When I applied critical thinking to the issue at hand the good natured would say “you’re just trying to cause problems”. This was because I was easier to deal with than actually questioning beligerent Phil.
Conclusion
We as a society need to ignore these people. Our society will be much the better place. The neurosis that is MMGW needs to be eliminated by means of the apathy it deserves. A great improvement in governance would be realized by letting those that vote for a cause be exclusively the people who fund that same cause. Those of us who care not should not be expected to partake in funding.
Remove the profit from such ventures: Let the full power of apathy be realized and it will remove the profit from such ventures that seek to bully the society and government into actions that materially benefit.
Its doubtful this recycling of mid 20th century liberal methodology will work. These are old methods not necessarily suited to use in the age of the internet. In the old days they suppressed viewpoints like mine by simply not allowing them on the air. ( reminiscent of them wanting to kill Fox News is it not ?! ). These types of hard core idea shredding methods are still not used yet on Fox or otherwise but their acceptance is growing. In the 70’s these type of ideas were treated as heretical and totally supressed making it much easier for a game like this to play out to a successful conclusion.
The libs are mal-adjusted people. Only the truly emotionally mature can fully digest these sort of advanced methods. Coercion is and always is bad. Its to be used as a last resort and only in cases where its absolutely necessary. Yet they use this method as their first option! Their severely confused moral code can only compute to bad endings. When everything you do is ”correct” how can our relationships endure? Thus you will have an excuse for every wrong you do anyone. Never will you have any cause for regret or room to analyze where you went wrong. A mature person can see this can only be fantasy.
The more people see of libs the more they will realize how un-cool they are. These are the types of folks who would cut you a bad business deal. Since EVERY interpersonal transaction is in effect a business deal that makes them VERY un-cool. Nothing will kill your success more dead than being this uncool.