Think about it ! Women are cheap with their own money but not with their man’s! They do like money. An ugly man can suddenly be oddly gorgeous once a woman finds out he has some net worth.
Think about it ! Women are cheap with their own money but not with their man’s! They do like money. An ugly man can suddenly be oddly gorgeous once a woman finds out he has some net worth.
What kind of jackass faints when Obama takes the stage? - either a fake or a real retard….( aka democrat ) ….While the guy is not ugly he’s no Wesley Snipes ok? God the crap that surfaces in the pond that is our society.
I think the fake explaination is the closest to true. In a bid to get the womens vote they fake up that he’s so darned hot that woman faint. While this sort of thing would NEVER work with a man it works with women. Women as a whole are as much concerned with what other people think of the status of a man as with his actual physical attractiveness. Thus the issue being muddy the campaign is exploiting this trying to drive the logic in the reverse direction. ( which is not safe to do!!! ) They are attempting to use faked up faintings to imply that Obama is important.
This is a long long cry from someone who used the power of ideas like Ronald Reagan. It bodes ill for how he will govern. It reminds me too much of how rappers make their money. Some talentless rhyming fool hires a bunch of curvy sluts to dance in their video. Young white and black fools watch the video, like the girls and want to emulate the fool in the video. Thus they buy the rap album making the rhyming fool rich. He then has much more budget to hire more curvy sluts for the next video and otherwise put on a bejeweled image that weak minded woman are prone to be attracted to. Pretty soon you are Kanye West, dancing superstar of Indian Television. All the while its payed for by the guys who want to be doing what the rhyming fool is doing, bumping all his hired models.
So is that the model we’ve been working under all along? Clearly yes….but some people have risen above this sort of simple facade for consumption. They governed by ideas. These people have generally NOT been in the democrat party and thus my contempt for the party in general.
Take Away Lesson: You may see and ugly woman in the drivers seat of a Corvette…..but you’ll never see one in the passenger seat.
Thought experiment:
You work in engineering and you need to borrow some hand work assemblers from the production department of you company. Describe who they loan you?
Results:
Generally speaking they will give you the screw up.
Reason:
They have a job to do and its called PRODUCTION ……not ENGINEERING! You can be sure they will give you the person they would be most likely to lay off in the next round.
This principle applies to outsourcing also. The following is an exerpt for this arty: Outsourcing - too successful to waste on teams of less than 50 people
We hire from all over the world, but we don’t get much talent from India. This week I went to a panel discussion about outsourcing and got a clear explanation why. The jobs that I work on are startup product builds with 4 to 10 team members. Those jobs are just too small to motivate an outsourcing company to assign good people. They save the best people for the biggest customers, which is exactly what I would do.
How bad is this problem? We qualify individual developers by hiring them for a week or two to work on real projects. When I pick individuals for this paid trial process, they succeed about 70% of the time. However, when I run trials with developers proposed by Indian companies, the trials succeed less than 15% of the the time. This happens even after I clearly explain my desire to find the best people, and my qualification process. If the trial does succeed, about 40% of the time the person who did the trial turns out not to be available. It’s “just kidding, we want you to work with a more junior person.” As a result, I quickly learned not to accept trials from Indian companies. The odds of finding someone good are too small to justify the effort.
It is the same effect. The screw ups go to the lowest priority projects.
and he owns a craftmatic bed. He is trying to perfect the art of auto-fellatio.
There are two very important things to remember if you are trapped in close quarters with a nut job with a gun:
1- Most people are not that good with a gun - put a solid object in between you and them and do not stand still. Dance according to the rythm of their shooting. I am not joking. Remember the lawyer Jerry Curry? He dodged bullets from behind a tree until his would be killer William Strier emptied a 6 shooter revolver from the other side of the tree. The link below is to a slide show. I could not find the video. The lesson here is do not go passive. If some one tries to kill you, do not go limp, make them work for it! Curry lived but caught several bullets in nonlethal locations.
http://www.nbc10.com/sh/slideshow/_auto/sh31989s16.html
2- Have you ever noticed that when people take pictures of people that some folks can manage to have their eyes closed in every photo? I know because I am one of these people. I have super sensitive blue eyes and hate the lingering light birdie that results from overdriven retinas. Thus from an early age I would smile for the camera and blink at just the right time to have my eyes closed when the flash goes off. You can apply this to shooting also. There will be small “tells” of when the shooter is going to fire. Use them to cue you as to when to move out of the way.