News Media Turns on the Clintons Proving No Honor Among Thieves
Tuesday, June 3rd, 2008The old saying is that there is no honor among theives. I think everyone has heard the phrase. Its simple in its meaning but I really think most have not given adequate thought to what the words really mean. Think about it. After a time as a thief you get accustomed to ripping people off. To lying. Sooner or later everything and everyone becomes fair game. Thus when 2 thieves get together its really hard for them not to turn on one another when the time ripens. If there is a pot of gold involved they are bound to try to make a move on one another. Its the classic scorpion riding the frog across the river story. This discussion applies to the Clintons and the news media. During the 90´s the main stream news media carried alot of water for the Clintons. It was hard to miss it was so out in the open. However since Hillary has been running in the primary against a black man all bets are off. The news media senses a dyed in the wool leftist in Obama and even better he is black. Thus Hillary was dropped like a hot rock. No critical reporting of Obama. He can do no wrong. He is BLACK don´t you know? Talking about rocks the mainstream media is dumb as a rock as a general rule. So rather than stay loyal and support Clinton they went for the black guy proving there is indeed no honor among thieves. Unless America wakes up they are going to find out this the hard way because electing a thief president is not a wise idea. The following phrase comes to mind: An engineer is a person that can do with 1 dollar what a thief needs 100 dollars to do I have seen this saying play out many times as I have indeed done things on the cheap! Yes the black guy has very little to say. It is his safest bet to get elected because if this guy said anything he believed he would be in real trouble. Unfortunately the mainstream media does not have the ethics of Rush Limbaugh. He always is up front about his opinions. The nice thing is he does it from pure core beliefs and his positions do not change to suit one candidate or another. So now we are in real danger of getting an affirmative action president because of the news medias preferences.
Yes you could, but why would you want to? 
































