All the explanations of matrix determinant leave out the motive behind the crime.  This is the worst thing that can possibly be done as everything flows from that.  You can get an idea where the definition of the determinant of a matrix came from by looking at the simplest case of a 2×2 system of equations:

(matrix{2}{2}{a b c d})(matrix{2}{1}{X_1 X_2})=(matrix{2}{1}{k_1 k_2})

To solve for X_1 reduce the b position coefficient to zero

(matrix{2}{2}{ad-cb 0 bc bd})(matrix{2}{1}{X_1 X_2})=(matrix{2}{1}{dk_1-bk_2 bk_2})

Here is the seed.  The solution looks like 

Det(matrix{2}{2}{a b c d})*X_1=Det(matrix{2}{2}{k_1 b k_2 d})

Which you should recognize as Cramers rule lurking in the bushes.

Now let us take it a little further.  Click into the links below to first see the derivation of the determinant of a 3×3 matrix.  Then clink into the derivation of the determinant of a 4×4 matrix and higher with recursion.  



Research Links

Categories: Math

Fudgy McFarlen

Woo hoo.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Jordan Peterson

Jordan Peterson on Prices Law

Price’s Law says that 50% of work at a company is done by the square root of the number of employees.  As an example take a company with 100 employees.  In that company 10 people Read more…


Reason for using Base 60 or 360 for Angles

Babylonian Triangle Table Research Links Wikipedia: Plimpton 322 Tablet Forget trigonometry, 'cos Babylonians did it better 3,700 years ago – by counting in base 60! Ancient Babylonian use of the Pythagorean Theorem and its Three Read more…


The Inevitable Knot in Your Long Extension Cord

This knot in my extension cord occurred inadvertently and thus I assumed with the highest likelihood it could be undone with a single pass through a cable end through a loop or loops with the loops Read more…